Carnegie Shul Chatter – February 20, 2014

Sabbath candle lighting time is 5:43

MINYAN

Yesterday I had the pleasure of having lunch with a friend from my days growing up in Eastmont whom I hadn’t seen in forty five years or so.  After that I picked up my step-son, Josh, at the airport and will now have the pleasure of a nearly two week visit with him.  And this morning I will be getting together with some of my fellow Pirates friends here in Florida for coffee and a gab session.

So what does this have to do with Minyan?

Well, think about it for a moment.

We could easily stay home and say our prayers at home and not take the time and effort to go to shul on Saturday morning, couldn’t we?  Why go out in the cold and fight the snow and ice and drive to Carnegie when God can hear our prayers anywhere, right?

Well, maybe God can hear our prayers anywhere, but when we go to shul we are joining with at least nine other Jews, nine other friends, nine other members of the family of Jews to pray and and to praise God together.

Humans were not meant to be recluses.  We are social beings who need the company and support of others.  When we go to shul for a minyan, we gather strength from our association with God and from our fellow Jews as well.  And we share in the fellowship of our friends at the Kiddush that we enjoy after services in the social hall of our shul.

So, why not push yourself out from under the covers this Saturday morning, and come on down to Carnegie.  Minyan begins at 9:30 and we’d love to have you join in.

If you’d like something a little more official about the reasons for a minyan, the following is from myjewishlearning.com:

Minyan: The Congregational Quorum

 

Only in a group of ten or more is there sufficient sanctity to recite certain public prayers.

 

By Rabbi Abraham Milligan

Rabbi Millgram wrote before it became the prevailing (but not universal) custom, as it is now, for women to be included among those whose presence constitutes a minyan in non-Orthodox synagogues.

Reprinted with permission from Jewish Worship, published by the Jewish Publication Society.

 

Congregational worship [has traditionally been] preferred to private devotions because it enabled one to respond to the reader’s call to worship [“Bar’khu“] and to recite the Kedushah [the expanded third blessing during the reader’s repetition] of the [Amidah, or “Shmoneh Esreh“–the common core of every prayer service]. At a public service one could also hear the reading of the scriptural selections, and a mourner could recite the Kaddish. In addition, one experienced the interstimulation that comes from worship with coreligionists.

 

What constitutes a congregation? The answer is a minyan, a minimum of ten adult Jews (an adult Jew is any Jewish male who has passed his thirteenth birthday). The number ten was derived from the first verse of Psalm 82, which reads: “God stands in the congregation of God.” The word edah (congregation) is also applied to the ten spies who, in the days of Moses, rendered a negative report on the land of Canaan. Hence it was established that a “congregation of God” consists of at least ten men.

 

In the geonic period the definition of the minyan was not rigid. In Massekhet Soferim (10:8), a late geonic work, we read that a minyan is required for the recitation of certain prayers–but, it is added, “our Sages in Palestine recite these prayers in the presence of seven . . . and some say even in the presence of only six.” The practice of the Palestinians did not prevail, however. The rule of the Babylonian Jews was adopted everywhere, and a full quorum of ten men has been required for public prayer.

 

It has also been argued whether one may include in the minyan a boy under thirteen when only one person is lacking for the quorum.

 

The authorities never agreed in this respect. Whilst the one insisted upon [the boy’s] having obtained his majority, the other was satisfied with his showing such signs of intelligence as would enable him to participate in the ceremony in question.

 

While the authorities have disagreed, congregational practice has usually been uncompromising. A congregation to be hallowed by the divine presence and to deserve the official designation of kehillah kedoshah (holy congregation) had to have the required quorum of ten mature worshipers.

 

The rabbis assumed that a minyan was not a hardship on any community. Larger communities were obviously not affected by this requirement, since they always had at least ten men of leisure known as batlanim. These men constituted the core of the permanent congregation and were highly respected for their piety and learning. In later centuries these men became paid functionaries and were frequently regarded as the ne’er-do-wells, who received a dole from the community in the form of a payment for their availability at all times for a congregational quorum.

 

This tradition has been revived in some modern synagogues which encounter difficulties in maintaining a daily service. These congregations have resorted to hiring a number of idle men to worship daily in their synagogues instead of the synagogues of their own choice.

 

The requirement of a full minyan for public services has caused hardships to many small communities. A pitiful example is the remnant of the once-thriving Jewish community of Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, a community that dates back to Roman days. Of the two hundred Jewish residents, only seventeen survived the Nazi slaughter–seven men and ten women. “We hold services on Sabbaths and festivals,” said the head of this miserable remnant to the writer, “even though we do not have a minyan. After all these centuries of unbroken Jewish religious life we dare not close the synagogue. In time, Jewish families from elsewhere may settle here. Then a real Jewish congregation will be reconstituted, and we shall again insist on a proper minyan.”

 

The sad situation of Dubrovnik is repeated in numerous, though less determined, Jewish communities scattered all over the world. Should such communities be granted official permission to revert to the ancient Palestinian practice? Or should they act independently, as do the Jews of Dubrovnik?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *